Friday, October 31, 2014

Good step, Tough Job - someone has to do it.



Jim Routledge
Candidate for Nanaimo Mayor 2014

PRESS RELEASE

Jim Routledge                                                                     Oct. 20, 2014

Candidate for Mayor of Nanaimo – Press Release

City Manager has to go!

I’ve made no secret of the fact that one of the key planks in my platform is ousting the current city manager and hiring the best we can find – with an MBA at minimum.

Given the results we have seen at City Hall, it’s quite simple to extrapolate that any business owner or Board of Directors would take a similar action. We have consistently seen poor and slow results – not to mention outright errors and poor judgment. Even when errors aren’t the direct result of the city manager’s actions, he must ultimately take responsibility for the actions of his staff – and for the hiring of that staff.

In fact, I question the hiring of the current manager in the first place – no job search, no job competition – simply putting in place the next person “in line.” This is no way to run a city.

The Leadercast debacle is just one example of a system failure - the real telling thing about that is that there was no move taken to change anything to indicate what went wrong. This error must land squarely at Ted Swabey’s feet. As for the subsequent “cover-up” and lack of information to the public, that is simply a deliberate lack of open and honest communication – but that’s a different topic.

When I make mistakes, I assess what went wrong and do something different; I make a change. I take responsibility for my errors.


I have seen nothing as a result of Leadercast or other slow and poor results. I have heard many calls for a core review at City Hall. I propose to start by hiring an extremely able and competent city manager who can turn this ship around and work with Mayor and Council as a fully functioning team.

Tuesday, October 28, 2014

"More than Jobs" - Nanaimo Child Development Centre

Good conversation below with Diane Brennan - a Nanaimo Council seasoned veteran and in my eye a "specialist" in the field.  We enjoyed an "All Candidates presentation" yesterday morning - some eye opening statistics about children in our community.  As sad as this is, I feel connected and inspired - finally a problem with numbers attached to it, measurable, quantifiable and qualifiable numbers.  How nice would it be if all the challenges facing Nanaimo Council were "digital" in nature and transparent to ideas and efforts.  I mean that I need to see the effect of my actions.  I learn by my mistakes and apply myself where results appear.

Here is what I learned and thanks to Diane for sharing it and letting me share it with you.


  • Jim Routledge
    Jim Routledge

    I got the impression that there was a bigger message this morning - they want something
    i got card from Scott Bradford - young and snappy - i like him
  • Diane Brennan
    Diane Brennan

    Yes they want us to deal with improving Nanaimo's track record on children and families vulnerability Too poor, too hungry, low education scores. We can't do it alone they know that but they want us to act where we can and push senior gov't do do more. For ex we should be pressuring gov't to have a child care policy. The NDP has started the ball on that.
  • Jim Routledge
    Jim Routledge

    good - that seems reasonable - we have made progress on Supportive Housing, there has been steps in right direction - is the big picture still that dark here?
  • Diane Brennan
    Diane Brennan

    I think if we use the stat on how many children come to school at 5 yrs "not ready to learn" then we have a problem. What that means is not the hunger issue because where breakfast programs are necessary they are used but it is the developmental readiness is not there for a large number of kids. That says something about the situation of families they are living with. So things like poor housing, lack of literacy, stress of making the rent, buying the food, getting to work on the bus etc. and sometimes violence
  • Jim Routledge
    Jim Routledge

    ok - you are awesome Diane - I can do something with this - I really do hear it when you put it in words like this. it really is about Jobs and getting this community moving - do you think i am missing something - I know you like Bill, he is awesome. I can deliver jobs - I do have a plan - call me crazy
  • Diane Brennan
    Diane Brennan

    Actually it is more than jobs. Quite a bit more. Many families are not able to work (disability - chronic illness, psychiatric disorders etc). Others have literacy levels that are too low. Many have developmental issues, too. So while you may bring in jobs, there are many vulnerable people that can't access them. Child care has to come along with jobs or who will be able to take those jobs. Access to trades training is as essential as higher education. Both things need grade 12 and our graduation levels lag way behind. Welfare rates are way lower than the Stats Canada Low Income Cut Off lines (LICO), and the living wage is higher than the LICOs. It is incredibly complex.
  • Jim Routledge
    Jim Routledge

    Good Balance is what I hear you say - "Child care has to come along with jobs" , "Both things", Housing, Mental Health, Education - yes its complex. I can see its something that nots going to get solved or even properly analyzed today - I need info - wow again lady, thanks

Sunday, October 26, 2014

Good NEWCASTLE ISLAND question. Whats in it for Jim?

  • Penelope Mutschler A lot of my friends are considering you but your stand on building a bridge to Newcastle is a worry.. That is such a beautiful and pristine place and the idea it takes a little effort to get to it makes it special .the sailing community which is vast always talks about the beauty of this ( marine ) park .. I know sailors from the eu and New Zealand, Australia who love it.. Is your company building it ?? Are you in anyway profiting from this..so many of my friends and there friends are not happy about this.
    12 hrs · Like · 1
  • Jim Routledge Good questions Penelope Mutschler, a natural connection to make but in fact not so. My love for Newcastle goes back to 1986 when I was hired as Executive Director of the Pavillion Society. (NIPS) I hired a food operator, put on dances, weddings-generally promoted Newcastle. I got money & support from a dozen civic groups groups to do a Plan. This plan is on my website- it's called the LEAD study. It was approved by BC Parks & the Society. That's really what I want- a reason to stop, learn & love Nanaimo history. I respect democracy and the market to figure out how to get there. I really did put the horse before the cart last election or in this case the bridge before the reason to go ... Does that help?
    11 hrs · Like
  • Penelope Mutschler So you love this island then.. We first came to nanaimo by sailboat to visit our son who was a student here.. We saw the beauty of this island and town from a different light then anyone who sees it by ferry .. We were so enchanted that we returned to the Sunshine Coast sold our waterfront property and moved here.. We've never looked back.. We have never stayed very long in one place but finally now have found our place of focus and sanctuary . Fourteen years later .. We're still enamoured with this town.. It was Newcastle that started this romance and we've met a lot of like
    minded people who also have come here because they saw the beauty and potential of this town .. We've seen the waterfront development taking place and hoping it doesn't destroy the storybook picture this towns waterfront has.. What makes our waterfront so special is or was to many it's quaintness ..no huge towers ,the lighthouse bistro, our bastion , the little green pickle boats . The park .. We want a mayor who protects this not tears it down for big business..
    11 hrs · Like
  • Jim Routledge Good comments Penelope Mutschler, that's real. There is such good reason to be careful, cautious & critical of any plan to "develop" Newcastle. There is equally pressing cause to share this treasure in a measured & responsible manner. I know I am playing with fire here- I hope you feel better knowing that I do have a plan, love and commitment to doing it right. Please keep an open mind on this - just give me a chance to show you what I want - explaining this is a losing proposition. One of the first things I would do if elected is to have a public open house/ e-town hall meeting to properly after all these years present the LEAD study. I have been waiting since 1986 to show the people who wanted the study what was actually done and approved. It's really cool.
    10 hrs · Like · 1
  • Penelope Mutschler Thank you for your response .
    10 hrs · Like
  • Jim Routledge

Friday, October 17, 2014

Good "NO, NOT NOW" on Bylaw 280 by Mary Polak

http://www2.news.gov.bc.ca/news_releases_2013-2017/2014ENV0090-001566.htm

Province of British Columbia
NEWS RELEASE
For Immediate Release
2014ENV0090-001566
October 17, 2014
Ministry of Environment
Province to review Metro Vancouver’s solid waste management plan
VANCOUVER – The Province will review Metro Vancouver’s solid waste management plan to determine the most-effective way to achieve waste diversion in the region.
Marvin Hunt, MLA for Surrey-Panorama, will conduct a three-month review focusing on the multi-family and industrial-commercial-institutional (ICI) waste streams and will report back with findings and provide advice to Environment Minister Mary Polak.
Hunt has extensive experience in waste management as the former chair of Metro Vancouver’s Waste Committee and former deputy chair of Metro Vancouver’s Zero Waste Committee, in addition to having been a Surrey councillor for 23 years.
This review is in response to Metro Vancouver’s proposed Bylaw 280 on waste flow control and will take into account the role local government and the private sector play in maximizing diversion from landfills.
Polak, as the statutory decision-maker, has decided not to approve Bylaw 280. In her decision letter to the Metro Vancouver Board, Polak cites a number of significant public-interest concerns that factored into the decision.
These concerns include:
  • the potential for Bylaw 280 to create a monopoly on waste management;
  • the potential for increased illegal dumping;
  • the possible negative effects on the new packaging and printed paper recycling program; and
  • the destabilizing effect it may have on private-sector collection and hauling.
Quote:
Mary Polak, Minister of Environment –
“I commend Metro Vancouver for their continued efforts toward protecting the environment and achieving the waste-diversion goals set out in their solid waste management plan. This review will help focus on the most-effective ways to achieve waste diversion going forward.”
Learn More:
BC Newsroom - Ministry of Environment:
http://www.newsroom.gov.bc.ca/ministries/environment-1

Media Contact:
Ministry of Environment Communications
250 953-3834

Connect with the Province of B.C. at: www.gov.bc.ca/connect

Thursday, October 16, 2014

Bylaw 280 Metro's point of view

The following is a copy of an email and info package that I received from Metro Vancouver's Solid Waste Manager Mr Paul Henderson.  See for yourself their reasons.
From: Paul Henderson <Paul.Henderson@metrovancouver.org>
Subject: Bylaw 280
Date: September 6, 2014 at 10:52:12 AM PDT
To: 'Jim Routledge' <jim@routledgehomes.com>

Jim: Good to meet you yesterday. As discussed, I have attached a package we have been providing to various people on Bylaw 280. We are confident that waste flow management/flow control is the single most important solid waste issue in the province, and is particularly important on the Island as we understand large amounts of waste are already being shipped of the Island by garbage disposal companies. If the waste export issue is not resolved, there will be significant negative impacts to island communities both financial, and environmental.
The package includes:
-          A presentation on Bylaw 280
-          A brochure on Bylaw 280
-          Excerpt from the Metro Vancouver solid waste plan specifically referencing the implementation of flow control measures
-          A bylaw 280 support letter from the Recycle First Coalition: A group of 12 local recycling firms with 825 employees who process 1,000,000 tonnes of recyclables a year along with a couple of other letters from other recycling entities
-          A bylaw 280 support letter from Paul Richard, Kwantlen’s Environmental Protection Technology Chair
-          Email from Peter Ladner, a former Vancouver City Councillor and sustainability expert
-          Bylaw 280 support letters from eight other regional districts across southern B.C. (All eight Boards passed resolutions either supporting Bylaw 280 directly or supporting the concept of flow control/waste flow management)
Let me know if you need any more information on the issue.
Paul.
Paul Henderson, P.Eng
General Manager of Solid Waste Services
Metro Vancouver
4330 Kingsway, Burnaby B.C.
V5H 4G8

                            Bylaw280 Package